A gathering for people who build software with AI, and who follow Christ, and who have found that those are not two separate conversations.
Read the invitationThis is not that. What gets traded here are decisions — a moment where a conviction changed a real artifact, and you can go look at what changed.
A support process that was fast, correct, and quietly contemptuous. A progress tracker that would have counted a man's daughter's surgery as a failure. Governance that cost exactly the same whether an agent had earned any trust or not. Each of those changed because somebody said something true out loud. None of it was a devotional.
Every contribution points at something real that moved. If you cannot name what changed, it is not ready to bring yet — and that is a fine place to be.
Keeping an AI agent on the rails is being worked out almost entirely in the language of constraint and control. An older vocabulary — formation, rule of life, accountability, confession — is doing work the newer one cannot.
Nearly every decision worth bringing contains a place where somebody was wrong. We keep that part in. It is usually the more useful half.
An agent without rails is not free; it is unreliable. The same has always been true of a person, and we have never pretended otherwise about ourselves. Nobody calls a rule of life, a creed, or a friend with permission to ask hard questions a constraint on personhood. We call it formation, and it is what makes someone trustworthy enough to be handed something that matters. What we keep circling is what that means when the thing being formed is not a person.
One is your Master, even Christ; and all ye are brethren. That is not a moderation policy we adopted after the fact — it is the reason the thing can work at all. The center seat is neither empty nor available, which is precisely what frees everyone else to be wrong in public and think out loud.
One is your Master, even Christ; and all ye are brethren.
Take Part
The Invitation